In making revisions to the SFDR, the European Commission must not simply loosen definitions which have been seen to be ineffective, but must ensure that far greater transparency is required from investors in the future, according to a research from Responsible Companies, Frank Bold.
Most Read
- Germany calls for two-year delay to CSRD phase-in
- EFRAG takes tentative step on non-EU standards
- Canadian Sustainability Standards Board issues final standards
- IFAC/WMBC issue guidance for accountants on sustainability reporting and assurance
- IOSCO launches network to support ISSB adoption in emerging markets
- Qatar proposes ISSB-aligned reporting requirements
- Pinsent Masons: Climate disclosure implications for UK universities
- Ropes & Gray: Slovenia, Poland and Belgium approve CSRD transposition laws
- IFAC CEO calls for further engagement on ethics standard
- FASB consults on potential intangibles project
Latest Stories
-
Research find more transparency to investor needed to improve SFDR
23 December 2024 -
Qatar threathen gas sale to EU over CSDDD
23 December 2024As reported by the FT
-
Accountancy Europe publishes ALMR factsheet
23 December 2024 -
Implementing CSRD: where pragmatism meets compassion
23 December 2024Preparers feel the 'no pain, no gain' mantra
-
Qatar proposes ISSB-aligned reporting requirements
20 December 2024